
doi: 10.3390/app15147705
In regions where transportation and the economy are closely integrated, optimizing network structure and enhancing synergy are vital for regional integration. This paper constructs a dual-factor linkage network using enterprise investment and liner shipping data to analyze linkage strength and synergy effects among cities in the Greater Bay Area. The findings reveal that (1) a core-periphery structure exists, with core cities dominating resource flows while secondary cities remain weak. The logistics network is led by Hong Kong and Shenzhen, while the capital flow network showcases the dominance of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, and Guangzhou. (2) From 2016 to 2021, interactions between transportation and the economy deepened, showing strong correlations in logistics and capital flows among core cities and between core and edge cities, but weaker correlations with sub-core and edge cities. Core cities stabilize regional transportation and economy, fostering agglomeration, while sub-core cities are more reliant on them, indicating a need for better resource balance. (3) The spatio-temporal coupling analysis reveals significant heterogeneity in flows among cities, with many exhibiting antagonistic couplings outside core areas. This study enhances understanding of synergy mechanisms in transportation and economic networks, offering insights for optimizing layouts and improving capital flow efficiency.
factor flow and allocation, Technology, Hong Kong and Macao Greater Bay Area, capital flow network, Guangdong, QH301-705.5, T, Physics, QC1-999, spatial equilibrium, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), Chemistry, logistics network, TA1-2040, Biology (General), QD1-999
factor flow and allocation, Technology, Hong Kong and Macao Greater Bay Area, capital flow network, Guangdong, QH301-705.5, T, Physics, QC1-999, spatial equilibrium, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), Chemistry, logistics network, TA1-2040, Biology (General), QD1-999
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
