
doi: 10.3390/app14219683
In eccentrically braced frames (EBFs), inelastic behavior is only permitted in the links. All members, except for the links, are designed according to the capacity design concept by using the link overstrength factor, Ω, so that they remain elastic even when the links develop their ultimate strength (including the strain-hardening effect). AISC 341 specifies that the Ω factor of link members must be 1.25 for beam and brace design and 1.1 for column design. In this study, the relevance of the current Ω factor was investigated. A total of 471 K-braced EBF systems with various conditions were designed using a multi-objective optimization technique, and nonlinear dynamic analyses were performed to evaluate the Ω factor. The results indicate that it is reasonable to use the current Ω factor for the design of beam outside link and brace; however, it leads to an overestimation of axial force in columns, especially in the lower stories of tall buildings. From the analysis results, a new Ω factor equation for column design was proposed. It was demonstrated that the structural quantities of 15-story frames designed using the proposed equation decreased by an average of 19% compared to those designed using the current Ω factor.
Technology, strain hardening, QH301-705.5, T, Physics, QC1-999, nonlinear dynamic analysis, eccentrically braced frame, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), Chemistry, capacity design, multi-objective optimization, link overstrength factor, TA1-2040, Biology (General), QD1-999
Technology, strain hardening, QH301-705.5, T, Physics, QC1-999, nonlinear dynamic analysis, eccentrically braced frame, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), Chemistry, capacity design, multi-objective optimization, link overstrength factor, TA1-2040, Biology (General), QD1-999
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
