
doi: 10.3390/app14051944
Cross-modal retrieval plays a key role in the Natural Language Processing area, which aims to retrieve one modality to another efficiently. Despite the notable achievements of existing cross-modal retrieval methodologies, the complexity of the embedding space increases with more complex models, leading to less interpretable and potentially overfitting representations. Most existing methods realize outstanding results based on datasets without any error or noise, but that is extremely ideal and leads to trained models lacking robustness. To solve these problems, in this paper, we propose a novel approach, Soft Contrastive Cross-Modal Retrieval (SCCMR), which integrates the deep cross-modal model with soft contrastive learning and smooth label cross-entropy learning to boost common subspace embedding and improve the generalizability and robustness of the model. To confirm the performance and effectiveness of SCCMR, we conduct extensive experiments comparing 12 state-of-the-art methods on three multi-modal datasets by using image–text retrieval as a showcase. The experimental results show that our proposed method outperforms the baselines.
soft contrastive learning, Technology, QH301-705.5, T, Physics, QC1-999, deep learning, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), smooth label learning, cross-modal retrieval, Chemistry, common subspace, TA1-2040, Biology (General), QD1-999
soft contrastive learning, Technology, QH301-705.5, T, Physics, QC1-999, deep learning, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), smooth label learning, cross-modal retrieval, Chemistry, common subspace, TA1-2040, Biology (General), QD1-999
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
