
The rapid and accurate identification of pathogenic spores is essential for the early diagnosis of diseases in modern agriculture. Gray mold disease, caused by Botrytis cinerea, is a significant threat to several crops and is traditionally controlled using fungicides or, alternatively, by UV-C radiation. Classically, the determination of conidial germination percentage, a key indicator for assessing pathogen viability, has been a manual, time-consuming, and error-prone process. This study proposes an approach based on deep learning, using one-stage detectors to automate the detection and counting of germinated and non-germinated conidia in microscopy images. We trained and assessed the performance of three models under several metrics: YOLOv8, YOLOv11, and RetinaNET. The results show that these three architectures provide an efficient and accurate solution for the recognition of gray mold conidia viability. Selecting the best model, we performed the task of detecting and counting conidia for determining the germination percentage on samples treated with different UV-C radiation dosages. The results show that these deep-learning models achieved counting accuracies that closely matched those obtained with conventional manual methods, yet they delivered results far more rapidly. Because they operate continuously without fatigue or operator bias, these models begin to open possibilities, after widening field tests and datasets, for efficient and fully automated monitoring pipelines for disease management in the agro-industry.
UV-C germicidal radiation, Botrytis cinerea, deep learning, single-stage detection models, object detection, transfer learning, conidial percentage germination
UV-C germicidal radiation, Botrytis cinerea, deep learning, single-stage detection models, object detection, transfer learning, conidial percentage germination
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
