Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Algorithmsarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Algorithms
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
DBLP
Article . 2025
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Feature Selection Method Based on Simultaneous Perturbation Stochastic Approximation Technique Evaluated on Cancer Genome Data Classification

Authors: Satya Dev Pasupuleti; Simone A. Ludwig;

Feature Selection Method Based on Simultaneous Perturbation Stochastic Approximation Technique Evaluated on Cancer Genome Data Classification

Abstract

Cancer classification using high-dimensional genomic data presents significant challenges in feature selection, particularly when dealing with datasets containing tens of thousands of features. This study presents a new application of the Simultaneous Perturbation Stochastic Approximation (SPSA) method for feature selection on large-scale cancer datasets, representing the first investigation of the SPSA-based feature selection technique applied to cancer datasets of this magnitude. Our research extends beyond traditional SPSA applications, which have historically been limited to smaller datasets, by evaluating its effectiveness on datasets containing 35,924 to 44,894 features. Building upon established feature-ranking methodologies, we introduce a comprehensive evaluation framework that examines the impact of varying proportions of top-ranked features (5%, 10%, and 15%) on classification performance. This systematic approach enables the identification of optimal feature subsets most relevant to cancer detection across different selection thresholds. The key contributions of this work include the following: (1) the first application of SPSA-based feature selection to large-scale cancer datasets exceeding 35,000 features, (2) an evaluation methodology examining multiple feature proportion thresholds to optimize classification performance, (3) comprehensive experimental validation through comparison with ten state-of-the-art feature selection and classification methods, and (4) statistical significance testing to quantify the improvements achieved by the SPSA approach over benchmark methods. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates the effectiveness of the feature selection and ranking-based SPSA method in handling high-dimensional cancer data, providing insights into optimal feature selection strategies for genomic classification tasks.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research