
doi: 10.3390/w12102894
handle: 11104/0313715
A modular electrocoagulation unit, supported by Ca(OH)2 addition to treated water, was operated in the vicinity of a Natura 2000 site for the removal of Cr6+ or Ni2+ from contaminated groundwater. The process was performed at a constant flow rate of 350 L/h. Day 0 concentrations of Cr6+ and Ni2+ started at 91.6 mg/L for Ni2+ and 43 mg/L for Cr and during testing, were decreased by 15%–25%. Residual concentrations of Crtot. and Ni2+ below the required limits of 0.5 mg/L for Crtot. and 0.8 mg/L for Ni2+ can be achieved with the electrocoagulation unit and total removal efficiencies often exceeded 98%. The overall economic assessment showed its feasible application for removal of Cr6+ and Ni2+ on sites with requirements of high environmental protection standards. The polluted area was about 150 × 150 m (22,500 m2), and it contained approximately 78,750 m3 of water contaminated with Cr6+ and Ni2+ (over 41 and 91 mg/L, respectively). The modular arrangement might allow a scaling up. The process’ output could be thus increased according to the number of EC modules in operation.
site remediation, nickel, electrocoagulation, removal, Natura 2000, water treatment, chromium
site remediation, nickel, electrocoagulation, removal, Natura 2000, water treatment, chromium
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
