
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
handle: 11392/2094412
The field of Probabilistic Logic Programming (PLP) has seen significant advances in the last 20 years, with many proposals for languages that combine probability with logic programming. Since the start, the problem of learning probabilistic logic programs has been the focus of much attention. Learning these programs represents a whole subfield of Inductive Logic Programming (ILP). In Probabilistic ILP (PILP) two problems are considered: learning the parameters of a program given the structure (the rules) and learning both the structure and the parameters. Usually structure learning systems use parameter learning as a subroutine. In this article we present an overview of PILP and discuss the main results.
Robotics and AI, statistical relational learning, probabilistic programming, Probabilistic Programming, inductive logic programming, Statistical Relational Learning, QA75.5-76.95, Probabilistic Logic Programming, logic programming, Electronic computers. Computer science, TJ1-1570, Logic Programming; Probabilistic Logic Programming; Inductive Logic Programming; Statistical Relational Learning; Probabilistic Programming, Mechanical engineering and machinery, probabilistic logic programming, Inductive Logic Programming
Robotics and AI, statistical relational learning, probabilistic programming, Probabilistic Programming, inductive logic programming, Statistical Relational Learning, QA75.5-76.95, Probabilistic Logic Programming, logic programming, Electronic computers. Computer science, TJ1-1570, Logic Programming; Probabilistic Logic Programming; Inductive Logic Programming; Statistical Relational Learning; Probabilistic Programming, Mechanical engineering and machinery, probabilistic logic programming, Inductive Logic Programming
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
views | 2 | |
downloads | 18 |