
Drawing on approach/inhibition theory of power, we investigated two factors that influence the manner by which victims react to workplace ostracism: the hierarchical status of the ostracizer and the level of an ostracizee's external social support including family, friends, and significant others. Across an experimental vignette study (Study 1) and a field study (Study 2), we found support for a three-way interaction with felt ostracism, ostracizee external social support, and ostracizer status influencing victims' organizational citizenship behavior and deviance directed toward other individuals. In addition, felt ostracism and ostracizee external social support interacted to predict turnover intentions. Overall, victims who were ostracized by a legitimate higher-status authority (e.g., manager) and whose external social support network was limited experienced the most negative outcomes across both studies. Our findings suggest that contextual factors both inside and outside the organization jointly impact the way in which individuals react to perceived workplace ostracism. Implications and future research directions are discussed.
Turnover intention, 330, interpersonal deviance, Workplace ostracism, turnover intention, external social support, organizational citizenship behavior, Interpersonal deviance, 650, approach/inhibition theory of power, Hierarchical status, BF1-990, Organizational citizenship behavior, External social support, Approach/inhibition theory of power, Psychology, workplace ostracism, hierarchical status
Turnover intention, 330, interpersonal deviance, Workplace ostracism, turnover intention, external social support, organizational citizenship behavior, Interpersonal deviance, 650, approach/inhibition theory of power, Hierarchical status, BF1-990, Organizational citizenship behavior, External social support, Approach/inhibition theory of power, Psychology, workplace ostracism, hierarchical status
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 56 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
