Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Frontiers in Microbi...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Frontiers in Microbiology
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Frontiers in Microbiology
Article
License: CC BY
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
PubMed Central
Other literature type . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: PubMed Central
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Frontiers in Microbiology
Article . 2020
Data sources: DOAJ
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Highly Sensitive and Rapid Identification of Streptococcus agalactiae Based on Multiple Cross Displacement Amplification Coupled With Lateral Flow Biosensor Assay

Authors: Xueqin Cheng; Xueqin Cheng; Zhiqian Dou; Jing Yang; Yulong Gu; Dexi Liu; Ling Xie; +5 Authors

Highly Sensitive and Rapid Identification of Streptococcus agalactiae Based on Multiple Cross Displacement Amplification Coupled With Lateral Flow Biosensor Assay

Abstract

Streptococccus agalactiae (S. agalactiae) is an important neonatal pathogen that is associated with mortality and morbidity. Therefore, we developed a rapid, accurate, and sensitive method based on multiple cross displacement amplification (MCDA) for the detection of the target pathogen. Four sets of MCDA primers were designed for targeting the S. agalactiae-specific groEL gene, and one set of MCDA primers with the optimum amplification efficiency was screened for establishing the S. agalactiae-MCDA assay. As a result, the newly-developed assay could be conducted at a fixed temperature (61°C) for only 30 min, eliminating the use of complex instruments. A portable and user-friendly nanoparticle-based lateral flow biosensor (LFB) assay was employed for reporting MCDA results within 2 min. Our results suggested that the detection limit of the S. agalactiae-MCDA-LFB assay is 300 fg per reaction, and no cross-reaction occurred with non-S. agalactiae strains. For 260 vaginal and rectal swabs, the detection rate of the MCDA-LFB assay was 7.7%, which was in accordance with the reference method of enrichment/qPCR, and higher by 4.6% than the CHROMagar culture. Moreover, the total procedure time of the MCDA-LFB assay was around 50 min, including sample collection, template preparation, MCDA reaction, and result reporting. Therefore, the MCDA-LFB assay is superior to enrichment/qPCR and CHROMagar culture and has great promise for point-of-care testing of S. agalactiae from vaginal and rectal swabs of pregnant women in resource-limited settings.

Related Organizations
Keywords

multiple cross displacement amplification, detection limit, MCDA-LFB, lateral flow biosensor, Microbiology, QR1-502, Streptococcus agalactiae

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Top 10%
Average
Average
Green
gold