Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Frontiers in Earth S...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Frontiers in Earth Science
Article . 2026 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Reservoir heterogeneity between intra-platform and platform-margin settings in an isolated carbonate platform: a case study from the carboniferous, Pre-Caspian Basin

Authors: Tianyu Zheng; Jiajun Wen; Lun Zhao; Xing Zeng; Shuqin Wang; Yefei Chen; Jue Hou;

Reservoir heterogeneity between intra-platform and platform-margin settings in an isolated carbonate platform: a case study from the carboniferous, Pre-Caspian Basin

Abstract

Introduction The Carboniferous isolated platform carbonate reservoirs in the Pre-Caspian Q6 Basin exhibit pronounced heterogeneity, which significantly constrains the effective prioritization and optimization of exploration targets. This study aims to elucidate the differential characteristics and genetic mechanisms of intra-platform and platform-margin reservoirs within the Carboniferous Unit 1 isolated carbonate platform in the southern Pre-Caspian Basin. Methods By integrating core and thin-section observations with porosity, permeability, mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP) data, and production performance analysis, we systematically compared the reservoir properties of the two settings. Results The results indicate that reservoir differentiation is primarily controlled by differential karstification within a unified depositional framework. Although both intra-platform and platform-margin settings exhibit comparable lithologies (mainly grainstones and packstones), their pore structures differ significantly. Intra-platform reservoirs are dominated by matrix porosity (e.g., selective dissolution pores) and show favorable porosity-permeability relationships. In contrast, platform-margin reservoirs develop heterogeneous fracture-vug systems, resulting in poor porosity-permeability correlations, while conventional core analysis systematically underestimates their actual flow capacity. Distinct karstification processes govern this spatial heterogeneity: facies-controlled penecontemporaneous dissolution shapes matrix porosity in intra-platform areas, whereas superimposed multi-phase coastal karstification creates complex fracture-vug networks along the platform margin. A differential pore evolution model is established to illustrate these mechanisms. Discussion and Conclusion These findings highlight the critical role of differential karstification in the diagenetic pathways of carbonate reservoirs. They not only elucidate the genetic mechanisms behind reservoir quality differences but also offer practical implications for reservoir evaluation and provide a robust theoretical foundation for predicting high-quality carbonate reservoirs in the study area and analogous geological settings.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Top 10%
Average
Average
gold