
handle: 11386/4837091
First-motion polarity determination is essential for deriving volcanic and tectonic earthquakes’ focal mechanisms, which provide crucial information about fault structures and stress fields. Manual procedures for polarity determination are time-consuming and prone to human error, leading to inaccurate results. Automated algorithms can overcome these limitations, but accurately identifying first-motion polarity is challenging. In this study, we present the Convolutional First Motion (CFM) neural network, a label-noise robust strategy based on a Convolutional Neural Network, to automatically identify first-motion polarities of seismic records. CFM is trained on a large dataset of more than 140,000 waveforms and achieves a high accuracy of 97.4% and 96.3% on two independent test sets. We also demonstrate CFM’s ability to correct mislabeled waveforms in 92% of cases, even when they belong to the training set. Our findings highlight the effectiveness of deep learning approaches for first-motion polarity determination and suggest the potential for combining CFM with other deep learning techniques in volcano seismology.
volcanic and tectonic earthquakes, first-motion polarity, machine learning, automatic classification; deep convolutional neural networks; first-motion polarity; machine learning; self-organizing maps; volcanic and tectonic earthquakes, Science, Q, self-organizing maps, automatic classification, deep convolutional neural networks
volcanic and tectonic earthquakes, first-motion polarity, machine learning, automatic classification; deep convolutional neural networks; first-motion polarity; machine learning; self-organizing maps; volcanic and tectonic earthquakes, Science, Q, self-organizing maps, automatic classification, deep convolutional neural networks
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
