
Loess has a strong water sensitivity, so loess landslides often transform into loess mudflows when water is added on the Chinese Loess Plateau, which results in high casualties and property loss of the Chinese government. In this study, a series of flume tests were designed to study the initiation of loess mudflows. The results reveal that the initiation modes of loess mudflows include large-scale mudflow and retrogressive toe sliding (Type A), and small-scale mudflow and retrogressive toe sliding (Type B). A model was used to analyze the test results that describe the effects of water flow on the potential for hillslope failure and liquefaction. It was found that the soil accumulation was unconditionally stable before a loess mudflow was formed, but as the rainfall continued, the water gradually infiltrated the soil, and the soil accumulation changed from unconditionally stable to unconditionally unstable. Thus, this led to different initiation modes during the tests. For Type A, the water preferentially infiltrated into the area with an uneven density and a large amount of water accumulated. The pore water pressure increased quickly and could not dissipate in time, so the loess liquefied. As the liquefaction area continued to expand and became larger, Type A occurred. Relatively speaking, Type B occurs in soil accumulations with relatively uniform densities. These results provide a certain scientific reference for the study of loess mudflows.
loess liquefaction, initiation modes, loess mudflow, flume tests, unconditionally stable, Science, Q, unconditionally unstable
loess liquefaction, initiation modes, loess mudflow, flume tests, unconditionally stable, Science, Q, unconditionally unstable
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
