Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Frontiers in Cardiov...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
PubMed Central
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: PubMed Central
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Adverse events associated with amlodipine: a pharmacovigilance study using the FDA adverse event reporting system

Authors: Jiazhen Jiang; Qian Zhong; Xinyu Zhou; Lisi Zhou; Jiyuan Zheng; Bingshuo Liu; Xingwei Di;

Adverse events associated with amlodipine: a pharmacovigilance study using the FDA adverse event reporting system

Abstract

BackgroundAmlodipine, a widely prescribed clinical medication, is associated with adverse reactions that can impede the proper execution of treatment regimens. The lack of systematic studies on amlodipine's adverse drug reactions (ADRs) necessitates further investigation to facilitate refined population management and optimize therapeutic outcomes.MethodThis study leveraged the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, extracting reports submitted exclusively by healthcare professionals where amlodipine was designated as the primary suspect (PS). Four risk signal detection methods were employed: Ratio of Odds Ratio, Proportional Reporting Ratio, Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network, and Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean, to conduct a comprehensive analysis of amlodipine-related ADRs. Furthermore, subgroup analyses stratified by gender and age were performed, with multivariable logistic regression utilized to validate the reliability of the findings.ResultsAcross the general population, male cohort, female cohort, elderly group, and younger demographic, the four signal detection methods collectively identified 513, 348, 403, 246, and 260 potential ADRs associated with amlodipine, respectively. Intersection analysis revealed 27 common ADRs, including gingival hypertrophy, vasoplegia syndrome, and distributive shock. Subsequent multivariable logistic regression confirmed amlodipine's role as an independent risk factor for all 27 ADRs (OR > 1, P < 0.05).ConclusionThis study provides compelling evidence that amlodipine poses risks of peripheral edema, shock, and dyspnea, among others. Additionally, it identified previously unreported ADRs such as abnormal full blood count and personality disorder. These findings underscore the importance of exercising caution when prescribing amlodipine to high-risk individuals with a history of hyperkalemia, cardiac structural abnormalities, or airway obstruction.

Keywords

adverse drug reactions, logistic regression, RC666-701, risk signal detection, Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system, amlodipine, Cardiovascular Medicine, FDA adverse event reporting system

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
gold