
With the development of endoscopic technology, an increasing number of patients with esophageal disease are being diagnosed, although the underlying pathogenesis of many esophageal diseases remains unclear. In recent years, a large number of studies have demonstrated that the occurrence and development of various intestinal diseases were related to intestinal flora. As a result, researchers have shifted their focus towards investigating esophageal flora to better understand the pathogenesis, early diagnosis, and treatment of esophageal diseases. This paper reviewed the normal esophageal flora and the changes of esophageal flora under different esophageal disease states. It was observed that there are distinct differences in the composition of esophageal microflora among Gastroesophageal Reflux, Barrett’s esophagus, eosinophilic esophagitis and normal esophagus. The normal esophageal flora was dominated by gram-positive bacteria, particularly Streptococcus, while the esophageal flora under esophagitis was dominated by gram-negative bacteria. Furthermore, the diversity of esophageal flora is significantly decreased in patients with esophageal cancer. Several potential microbial biomarkers for esophageal cancer have been identified, among which Fusobacterium nucleatum showed a close association with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma’s pathological stage and clinical stage.
Esophageal Neoplasms, gastroesophageal reflux, Esophageal Diseases, Microbiology, QR1-502, eosinophilic esophagitis, Barrett Esophagus, Cellular and Infection Microbiology, microbiota, Barrett’s esophagus, Humans, esophageal cancer, Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma, esophageal diseases
Esophageal Neoplasms, gastroesophageal reflux, Esophageal Diseases, Microbiology, QR1-502, eosinophilic esophagitis, Barrett Esophagus, Cellular and Infection Microbiology, microbiota, Barrett’s esophagus, Humans, esophageal cancer, Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma, esophageal diseases
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
