
In the early 1950s, Austin and Chang independently described the changes that are required for the sperm to fertilize oocytes in vivo. These changes were originally grouped under name of "capacitation" and were the first step in the development of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in humans. Following these initial and fundamental findings, a remarkable number of observations led to characterization of the molecular steps behind this process. The discovery of certain sperm-specific molecules and the possibility to record ion currents through patch-clamp approaches helped to integrate the initial biochemical observation with the activity of ion channels. This is of particular importance in the male gamete due to the fact that sperm are transcriptionally inactive. Therefore, sperm must control all these changes that occur during their transit through the male and female reproductive tracts by complex signaling cascades that include post-translational modifications. This review is focused on the principal molecular mechanisms that govern human sperm capacitation with particular emphasis on comparing all the reported pieces of evidence with the mouse model.
capacitation, HUMAN SPERM, CAPACITATION, QH301-705.5, hyperactivation, ACROSOMAL EXOCYTOSIS, human sperm, Cell and Developmental Biology, HYPERACTIVATION, fertilization, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6, FERTILIZATION, Biology (General), https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1, acrosomal exocytosis
capacitation, HUMAN SPERM, CAPACITATION, QH301-705.5, hyperactivation, ACROSOMAL EXOCYTOSIS, human sperm, Cell and Developmental Biology, HYPERACTIVATION, fertilization, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6, FERTILIZATION, Biology (General), https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1, acrosomal exocytosis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 218 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
