
doi: 10.3386/w15379
We study the output costs of 40 systemic banking crises since 1980. Most, but not all, crises in our sample coincide with a sharp contraction in output from which it took several years to recover. Our main findings are as follows. First, the current financial crisis is unlike any others in terms of a wide range of economic factors. Second, the output losses of past banking crises were higher when they were accompanied by a currency crisis or when growth was low at the onset of the crisis. When accompanied by a sovereign debt default, a systemic banking crisis was less costly. And, third, there is a tendency for systemic banking crises to have lasting negative output effects.
Financial crises ; Financial markets ; Financial institutions ; Banks and banking ; Economic conditions, Cost of Crisis; Crises; Output loss; Recovery; Systemic Banking Crisis, jel: jel:E32, jel: jel:E44, jel: jel:G01
Financial crises ; Financial markets ; Financial institutions ; Banks and banking ; Economic conditions, Cost of Crisis; Crises; Output loss; Recovery; Systemic Banking Crisis, jel: jel:E32, jel: jel:E44, jel: jel:G01
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 94 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
