
Most nations have experienced an internal armed conflict since 1960. Yet while civil war is central to many nations' development, it has stood at the periphery of economics research and teaching. The past decade has witnessed a long overdue explosion of research into war's causes and consequences. We summarize progress, identify weaknesses, and chart a path forward. Why war? Existing theory is provocative but incomplete, omitting advances in behavioral economics and making little progress in key areas, like why armed groups form and cohere, or how more than two armed sides compete. Empirical work finds that low per capita incomes and slow economic growth are both robustly linked to civil war. Yet there is little consensus on the most effective policies to avert conflicts or promote postwar recovery. Cross-country analysis of war will benefit from more attention to causal identification and stronger links to theory. We argue that micro-level analysis and case studies are also crucial to decipher war's causes, conduct, and consequences. We bring a growth theoretic approach to the study of conflict consequences to highlight areas for research, most of all the study of war's impact on institutions. We conclude with a plea for new and better data. (JEL D72, D74, O17)
330, Economics, growth, FOS: Political science, O40, violence, C80 Keywords: Civil war, JEL codes: H56, H56, O10, O40, C80 Keywords: Civil war, violence, economic development, growth [JEL codes], Political science, O10, 320, economic development, jel: jel:C80, jel: jel:O40, jel: jel:D74, jel: jel:D72, jel: jel:H56, jel: jel:O10, jel: jel:O17
330, Economics, growth, FOS: Political science, O40, violence, C80 Keywords: Civil war, JEL codes: H56, H56, O10, O40, C80 Keywords: Civil war, violence, economic development, growth [JEL codes], Political science, O10, 320, economic development, jel: jel:C80, jel: jel:O40, jel: jel:D74, jel: jel:D72, jel: jel:H56, jel: jel:O10, jel: jel:O17
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2K | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% |
