
doi: 10.3386/w14493
There is a vast literature on the relationship between trade policy and growth, including several papers on the late 19 th century experience (e.g. O’Rourke 2000, Clemens and Williamson 2004). However, standard trade models suggest that the structure of protection, rather than the overall average tariff level, should matter for resource allocation and hence for growth. This paper assembles a database of agricultural, manufacturing and revenue tariffs for 10 countries between 1875 and 1913, and asks what the relationship was between each of these variables and (a) aggregate (b) sectoral growth.
growth; history; tariffs, jel: jel:N10, jel: jel:F43, jel: jel:O49, jel: jel:F13, jel: jel:N70
growth; history; tariffs, jel: jel:N10, jel: jel:F43, jel: jel:O49, jel: jel:F13, jel: jel:N70
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
