
This paper analyzes the relationship between the diffusion of new technologies and the decentralization of firms. Centralized control relies on the information of the principal, which we equate with publicly available information. Decentralized control, on the other hand, delegates authority to a manager with superior information. However, the manager can use his informational advantage to make choices that are not in the best interest of the principal. As the available public information about the specific technology increases, the tradeoff shifts in favor of centralization. We show that firms closer to the technological frontier, firms in more heterogeneous environments, and younger firms are more likely to choose decentralization. Using three data sets on French and British firms in the 1990s, we report robust correlations consistent with these predictions.
firm, 2002 Economics and Econometrics, [QFIN] Quantitative Finance [q-fin], 330 Economics, Diffusion, firms, Decentralization; heterogeneity; learning; the theory of the firm., 10007 Department of Economics, technology, Decentralization, heterogeneity, learning, the theory of the firm, [SHS] Humanities and Social Sciences, decentralization; heterogeneity; learning; the theory of the firm, technologies, jel: jel:F23, jel: jel:O31, jel: jel:O33, jel: jel:O32
firm, 2002 Economics and Econometrics, [QFIN] Quantitative Finance [q-fin], 330 Economics, Diffusion, firms, Decentralization; heterogeneity; learning; the theory of the firm., 10007 Department of Economics, technology, Decentralization, heterogeneity, learning, the theory of the firm, [SHS] Humanities and Social Sciences, decentralization; heterogeneity; learning; the theory of the firm, technologies, jel: jel:F23, jel: jel:O31, jel: jel:O33, jel: jel:O32
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 357 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
