
handle: 10419/23459
This paper studies the consumption decisions of agents who face costs of acquiring, absorbing and processing information. These consumers rationally choose to only sporadically update their information and re-compute their optimal consumption plans. In between updating dates, they remain inattentive. This behavior implies that news disperses slowly throughout the population, so events have a gradual and delayed effect on aggregate consumption. The model predicts that aggregate consumption adjusts slowly to shocks, and is able to explain the excess sensitivity and excess smoothness puzzles. In addition, individual consumption is sensitive to ordinary and unexpected past news, but it is not sensitive to extraordinary or predictable events. The model further predicts that some people rationally choose to not plan, live hand-to-mouth, and save less, while other people sporadically update their plans. The longer are these plans, the more they save. Evidence using U.S. aggregate and microeconomic data generally supports these predictions.
ddc:330, D1, E2, D8, Informationsverhalten, Konsumentenverhalten, Gesamtwirtschaftlicher Konsum, D9, bounded rationality; consumption; excess sensitivity; excess smoothness; hand-to-mouth consumers; inattentiveness, Theorie, USA, jel: jel:D1, jel: jel:E2, jel: jel:D8, jel: jel:D9
ddc:330, D1, E2, D8, Informationsverhalten, Konsumentenverhalten, Gesamtwirtschaftlicher Konsum, D9, bounded rationality; consumption; excess sensitivity; excess smoothness; hand-to-mouth consumers; inattentiveness, Theorie, USA, jel: jel:D1, jel: jel:E2, jel: jel:D8, jel: jel:D9
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 407 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
