Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

POTENSI SIRUP BUAH NAGA: ANALISIS KOMPARATIF KUALITAS SENSORI DAGING DAN KULIT BUAH

Authors: Azizah Septia Rahma; Elida Elida; Rahmi Holinesti; Sari Mustika;

POTENSI SIRUP BUAH NAGA: ANALISIS KOMPARATIF KUALITAS SENSORI DAGING DAN KULIT BUAH

Abstract

Abstract: Dragon fruit (Hylocereus spp.) has great potential in food processing, but the use of fruit peels is still limited. This study aims to analyze the difference in the sensory quality of syrup made from the juice of the flesh and skin of red dragon fruit through a hedonic test approach. The research method used pure experiments with a completely random design involving 30 consumer panelists from the Family Welfare Education Study Program at Padang State University. Data collection was carried out through sensory tests using a 7-point hedonic scale to assess four parameters: color, aroma, texture, and taste. The results showed a significant difference only in the color parameter, with dragon fruit juice obtaining an average score of 6.01 compared to dragon fruit peel with 5.59 (t-count 3.172, p < 0.05). The aroma, texture, and taste parameters did not show significant differences, with very close average scores. Statistical analysis revealed that both types of syrup had relatively equivalent sensory qualities, with individual panelist variations ranging from 0.927-1.368. This research makes an important contribution to the exploration of the use of dragon fruit peels as an alternative raw material for food products, as well as encouraging innovations in sustainable agricultural waste processing.Keywords: Dragon Fruit, Syrup, Hedonic Test, Sensory Quality, Agricultural Waste.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!