Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Marine Ecology Progr...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Marine Ecology Progress Series
Article . 1992 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Giant marine viruses?

Authors: G Bratbak; OH Haslund; M Heldal; A Naess; T Roeggen;

Giant marine viruses?

Abstract

Unusually large virus-hke particles (VLPs) with tails were found in water samples from Norwegian and Danish coastal waters. Size of the VLP heads were 340 to 400 nm and the tails were 2.2 to 2.8 vm long. The VLPs occurred at a maximum concentration of about 104 ml-'. The possible hosts are unknown. Most viruses measure between 20 and 350 nm (Bitton 1980). The largest are found among the animal viruses and the smallest among the plant viruses and the bacteriophages. Filamentous viruses may be as long as 1000 nm or longer, but the diameter of these viruses is 10 nm or less (Bradley 1967, Laskin & Lechevalier 1973). The viral population of natural marine waters is dominated by forms with heads < 60 nm in diameter (Bergh et al. 1989). Most of these small viruses are thought to be bacteriophages (Bratbak et a1 1990). Viruses in the size range of 100 to 150 nm usually make up < 1 to 10 % of marine viral communities. Water samples in w h c h we observed unusually large virus-like particles (VLPs) were collected at 0.2 m depth in Raunefjorden, western Norway in April 1991 (Bratbak et al. 1990) and during a mesocosm experiment in Knebelvig, Denmark in July 1991 (Nybroe et al. 1992). The mesocosm experiment was set up in the beginning of July and sampled every 2 or 3 d for 3 wk. Samples preserved with 1 O/O glutaraldehyde were harvested by centrifugation onto electron microscope grids, stained with 2 % uranyl-acetate, and inspected in a JEOL100CX transmission electron microscope as previously described (B~rsheim et al. 1990, Bratbak et al. 1990). The VLPs (Fig. l a ) we observed in the mesocosm experiment were found in 2 of the 4 enclosures investigated. A maximum concentration of ca 104 ml-' was observed on Day 5 of the experiment. The particles were also found in the sample taken 3 d later, but not in earlier or later samples. The head structure of the particles appears to have an octahedral form and the size of the head, as it appears on the electron micrographs, was 370 nm (SD = 17) X 340 nm (SD = 12). The tail structure was ca 2.2 pm (SD = 0.3) long and 80 to 85 nm wide. The VLP found in the free water masses of Raunefjorden was similar in morphology to the VLP found in the enclosure study (Fig. lA , B) but the head structure was slightly larger (400 X 370 nm) and the tail structure was about 2.8 pm long and 55 to 60 nm wide. The only comparable VLP we know of has a head diameter of 390 nm and a tail of about 1 pm and has been found in cultures of the filamentous green algae Uronema gigas (Dodds & Cole 1980). Fig. 1. Transmission electron micrograph of the unusually large virus-like particles. (A) Sample from mesocosm experiment in Denmark; (B) sample from Raunefjorden, Norway. Arrow: virus-like particles of a more typical size (< 100 nm); b: bacterium O Inter-Research 1992 0171-8630/92/0085/0201/$ 03.00 202 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 85: 201-202, 1992 Compared to microorganisms such as bacteria and flagellates, viruses will generally appear as electrondense structures after positive staining with uranylacetate due to their high nucleic acid content. As shown in Fig. 1A. B the large VLPs have a high electron density in the head structure. We do not know of any biological or non-biological structure that gives a similar appearance after this preparation and we therefore assume that these particles are indeed viruses. The host of the viruses found in the enclosure study must be a planktonic organism because they were produced within the enclosures where only planktonic organisms were present. The size of these large viruses limits the number of possible host organisms. The viruses we observed resemble tailed bacteriophages but the size of the bacteria (Fig. 1) found together with the viruses makes them unlikely hosts. The eucaryotic community found together with the virus in the enclosure study was numerically dominated by unidentified autotrophic and heterotrophic forms that were 1 to 5 pm in diameter. The most abundant larger phytoplankton forms included the diatoms Rhizosolenia fragilissima and Probiscia alata; some unidentified cryptophyceans; some dinophyceans (including Gymnodim.um sp. and Scripsiella sp.); and the chrysophyceans Dinobryon balticum and D. petiiolatum. The most abundant protozoans included colorless flagellates, and the ciliates Urotricha sp., Strombidium spp., and Mesodinium rubrum. The roles of viruses in natural waters have just begun to be revealed and we are still groping to find our way with new methods and approaches. Our observation of the large VLP is mainly qualitative and its host is unknown. The finding does emphasize that the choice of method for detecting and counting viruses may be crucial. Large viruses such as those described here would probably have been lost if any prefiltration had been applied (Cottrell & Suttle 1991, Paul et al. 1991) and they would probably have been considered small bacteria if they had been observed in the epifluorescence microscope after staining with DAPI (Hara et al. 1991). This note was submitted to the editor Acknowledgements. This study was supported by the EEC MAST program, contract no. 0020, the Danish Natural Research Council, Danish Technical Research Council (J.-nos. 11-8630 and 16-4806), National Agency of Environmental Protection in Denmark (HAV9O Marine Research Programme in Denmark contract no. 1.23), the Royal Norwegian Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (contract 27744), the Norwegian Council for Fisheries Research, and the Norwegian Council for Science and the Humanities. The electron microscope work was done at the Laboratory for Electron ~Microscopy, Science Faculty, Univ. of Bergen.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    24
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
24
Average
Top 10%
Average
bronze