
doi: 10.3322/caac.21187
pmid: 23625473
Abstract Despite the difficulty in clearly defining and measuring spirituality, a growing literature describes its importance in oncology and survivorship. Religious/spiritual beliefs influence patients' decision‐making with respect to both complementary therapies and aggressive care at the end of life. Measures of spirituality and spiritual well‐being correlate with quality of life in cancer patients, cancer survivors, and caregivers. Spiritual needs, reflective of existential concerns in several domains, are a source of significant distress, and care for these needs has been correlated with better psychological and spiritual adjustment as well as with less aggressive care at the end of life. Studies show that while clinicians such as nurses and physicians regard some spiritual care as an appropriate aspect of their role, patients report that they provide it infrequently. Many clinicians report that their religious/spiritual beliefs influence their practice, and practices such as mindfulness have been shown to enhance clinician self‐care and equanimity. Challenges remain in the areas of conceptualizing and measuring spirituality, developing and implementing training for spiritual care, and coordinating and partnering with chaplains and religious communities. CA Cancer J Clin 2013;63:280–289 . © 2013 American Cancer Society .
Physician-Patient Relations, Decision Making, Self Concept, Spiritual Therapies, Psychotherapy, Religion, Caregivers, Neoplasms, Adaptation, Psychological, Quality of Life, Humans, Spirituality, Survivors
Physician-Patient Relations, Decision Making, Self Concept, Spiritual Therapies, Psychotherapy, Religion, Caregivers, Neoplasms, Adaptation, Psychological, Quality of Life, Humans, Spirituality, Survivors
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 190 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
