Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Jurnal Dunia Farmasiarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Jurnal Dunia Farmasi
Article . 2019 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Jurnal Dunia Farmasi
Article
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: UnpayWall
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Persepsi Konsumen terhadap Pelayanan Kefarmasian Apotik di Jemadi Natural

Authors: Bustami Bustami; Khairani Fitri;

Persepsi Konsumen terhadap Pelayanan Kefarmasian Apotik di Jemadi Natural

Abstract

Pendahuluan: Masyarakat Indonesia saat ini membutuhkan pelayanan kesehatan yang bermutu berdasarkan lima dimensi yaitu tingable (bukti nyata), reliability (kehandalan), responsiveness (ketanggapan), assurance (jaminan) dan empathy (perhatian). Tujuan: untuk mengetahui bagaimana persepsi konsumen terhadap pelayanan kefarmasian yang diterapkan di Apotek Jemadi Natural Tahun 2017. Metode: Penelitian ini dilakukan menggunakan penelitian deskriptif. Jumlah sampel 172orang. Hasil penelitian dianalisis menggunakan analsis univariat. Hasil: penelitian pelayanan kefarmasian adalah Tingible (bukti nyata) konsumen yang mengatakan tidak baik sebanyak 24 orang (14%), cukup baik sebanyak 18 orang (10,5%), baik sebanyak 97 (56,3%), dan sangat baik 33 (19,2%).Reliability (kehandalan)konsumen yang mengatakan tidak baik tidak ada, cukup baik sebanyak 11 orang (6,4%), baik 61 orang (35,5%), dan sangat baik 100 orang (58,1%).Responsiveness (Ketanggapan)konsumen yang mengatakan tidak baik tidak ada, cukup baik sebanyak 16 orang (9,3%), baik 99 orang (57,6%), dan sangat baik 57 orang (33,1%).Assurance (Jaminan) konsumen yang mengatakan tidak baik tidak ada, cukup baik sebanyak 14 orang (8,1%), baik 60 orang (34,9%), dan sangat baik 98 orang (57%).Empathy (Perhatian) konsumen yang mengatakan tidak baik sebanyak 1 orang (0,6%), cukup baik sebanyak 9 orang (5,2%), baik 95 orang (55,2%), dan sangat baik 97 orang (39%). Kesimpulan: penelitian ini yaitu persepsi konsumen pelayanan kefarmasian di apotekJemadi Natural lebih banyak mengatakan baik dalam arti pelayanan kefarmasian sudah lebih memperhatikan kekurangan fasilitas salah satunya parkir, ruang tunggu, pelayanan, buktinyata, kehandalan, ketanggapan, jaminan, danperhatiandi apotekJemadi Natural.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold