
doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a35519
pmid: 26814319
To clinically evaluate the performance of indirect composite resin restorations cemented with conventional and self-adhesive resin cements over a 12-month period.Ten patients fulfilled all the inclusion criteria. Twenty-four composite resin restorations were performed using an indirect technique and cemented with a resin cement (RelyX ARC) or a self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U100). Two independent evaluators analyzed the restorations using modified USPHS criteria after periods of two weeks and 6 and 12 months. Statistical significance between the cements at each timepoint was evaluated with the Wilcoxon test and between timepoints with the Mann-Whitney test, both at a significance level of 5%. Fisher's exact test was used to assess the occurrence of absolute failures.No statistically significant differences were found between the groups at the same timepoint nor between groups at different timepoints. The only significant difference was found for color match for both groups after 12 months.After 12 months, indirect composite resin restorations cemented with self-adhesive resin cement performed similarly to those cemented with conventional resin cement.
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Color, Dental Marginal Adaptation, Middle Aged, Composite Resins, Dental Polishing, Polyethylene Glycols, Dental Materials, Polymethacrylic Acids, Inlays, Humans, Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate, Female, Dental Cavity Preparation, Cementation, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Color, Dental Marginal Adaptation, Middle Aged, Composite Resins, Dental Polishing, Polyethylene Glycols, Dental Materials, Polymethacrylic Acids, Inlays, Humans, Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate, Female, Dental Cavity Preparation, Cementation, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
