Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Accuracy of intraoral scanners in the cleft anatomy of neonates.

Authors: Raphael, Ferrari; Mutlu, Özcan; Daniel, Wiedemeier; Harald, Essig;

Accuracy of intraoral scanners in the cleft anatomy of neonates.

Abstract

The present study investigated the accuracy of intraoral scanners (IOSs) based on different image acquisition technologies in the field of presurgical orthopedic treatment (PSOT) in neonates with cleft palate.Dental casts of clinical situations representing unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP), and cleft palate (CP) with reference polyetheretherketone (PEEK) scanbodies (Cares RC Mono Scanbody) were scanned utilizing four IOS systems: Carestream CS3600 (CS), Medit i500 (MD), Cerec Omnicam (CO), and Trios 3 (TS). One calibrated operator made five scans from each model using each IOS (N = 60). Reference digital impressions were obtained by an industrial-grade laboratory scanner (Sirona inEos X5) and superimposed using a best-fit algorithm. The divergence measure was extracted and the scanners were compared in terms of their accuracy using generalized least squares statistical models that account for variance heterogeneity. Additionally, comparative 3D analysis of the scans was performed using reverse engineering software (Geomagic Control X) in order to measure the discrepancy between the intraoral scans and the reference scan in five different anatomical regions of interest (ROIs): alveolar crest (AC), cleft (CL), palate (PL), vestibulum (VS), premaxilla (PM).The four IOSs showed relevant and significant differences in estimated trueness (P 0.001) and precision (P = 0.009). Among all anatomical models and analyzed ROIs, TS had the best accuracy (trueness: -1.57 µm; precision: 9.41 µm), followed by MD (trueness: -20.63 µm; precision: 29.18 µm), CS (trueness: -40.43 µm; precision: 16.52 µm) and CO (trueness: 81.27 µm; precision: 40.32 µm).Impression taking of the maxilla in cleft lip and palate patients is challenging for the operator. Relevant and significant differences in trueness and precision were found between the four IOSs. TS showed the best accuracy and was the least influenced under different anatomical ROIs. (Int J Comput Dent 2025;28(3):225-0; doi: 10.3290/j.ijcd.b5886430).

Keywords

Cleft Palate, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Dental Impression Technique, Cleft Lip, Infant, Newborn, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Models, Dental

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!