Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
Agro Productividadarrow_drop_down
Agro Productividad
Article . 2026 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Physicochemical evaluation of the meat of the American Bullfrog (Lithobates Catesbeianus)

Authors: Cecilia Ortiz-Ortiz; Marian C. Valencia-Cobos; Brenda Camacho-Carrasco; Rigoberto V. Pérez-Ruiz; María B. Arce-Vázquez; José E. Aguilar-Toalá; Monzerrat Rosas-Espejel; +1 Authors

Physicochemical evaluation of the meat of the American Bullfrog (Lithobates Catesbeianus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine the physicochemical characteristics of bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) meat. Design/methodology/approach: Fifteen samples of bullfrog legs and fifteen samples of chicken meat were used. Subsequently, 50% of the meat was cooked in a water bath. Results: Bullfrog meat had less protein and more fat (P<0.05) than chicken meat. The percentage of moisture and collagen was higher in bullfrog meat (P<0.05). The L*, a*, and b* values ​​showed significant differences, with greater luminosity in cooked bullfrog meat, while a* showed a variation of 2.36 units in raw vs. cooked meat. b* was higher in cooked meat (P<0.05) compared to raw meat. The parameters water activity, water-holding capacity, and pH showed significant differences (P<0.05) between the two treatments analyzed. Limitations/Implications of the study: The number of bullfrog samples was limited due to their cost and producers' distrust of institutional and governmental organizations. Findings and Conclusion: Bullfrog meat is lean. The meat presented water activity values ​​below the established limit for meat. This species is a viable alternative in the food sector.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!