
doi: 10.32854/c73vrt46
Objective: To determine the physicochemical characteristics of bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) meat. Design/methodology/approach: Fifteen samples of bullfrog legs and fifteen samples of chicken meat were used. Subsequently, 50% of the meat was cooked in a water bath. Results: Bullfrog meat had less protein and more fat (P<0.05) than chicken meat. The percentage of moisture and collagen was higher in bullfrog meat (P<0.05). The L*, a*, and b* values showed significant differences, with greater luminosity in cooked bullfrog meat, while a* showed a variation of 2.36 units in raw vs. cooked meat. b* was higher in cooked meat (P<0.05) compared to raw meat. The parameters water activity, water-holding capacity, and pH showed significant differences (P<0.05) between the two treatments analyzed. Limitations/Implications of the study: The number of bullfrog samples was limited due to their cost and producers' distrust of institutional and governmental organizations. Findings and Conclusion: Bullfrog meat is lean. The meat presented water activity values below the established limit for meat. This species is a viable alternative in the food sector.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
