
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>Objective : to assess the effectiveness of participation in pregnancy classes to inform such a prenatal program for physicians and midwives, focusing to reduce the incidence of obstetric labor complications and cesarean section. Methods : This study was done using an analytic observational approach, using a cross-sectional study and consecutive sampling. One hundred and ninety-four participants of this study were women aged 20–35 years who gave birth between January and November 2019 in balarejo sub-district, East Java, Indonesia. The subjects were divided into two groups: participation (four times) and non-participation (less than four times) in the pregnancy classes. The analyzed outcomes are labor complications (prolonged labor, postpartum hemorrhage, postpartum fever, premature rupture of membrane), and cesarean section birth.. Results: The results of this study indicate that participants of pregnancy classes have a significantly lower probability of suffering prolonged labor (OR=0.05, 95% CI=0.01-0.23, p<0.05), postpartum hemorrhage (OR=0.20, 95% CI=0.04-0.95, p<0.05), and postpartum fever (OR=0.13, 95% CI=0.16-1.08, p<0.05) compared with non-participants. Also, participating women have a lower chance of undergoing cesarean section (OR=0.08, 95% CI=0.03-0.21, p<0.05). Conclusion : The incidence of obstetric labor complications and cesarean section can be effectively reduced by the participation of pregnant woman class.
RG1-991, Gynecology and obstetrics
RG1-991, Gynecology and obstetrics
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
