Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Oto Rhino Laryngolog...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Oto Rhino Laryngologica Indonesiana
Article . 2011 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Perbandingan efektivitas flutikason furoat intranasal dengan dan tanpa loratadin oral pada penderita rinitis alergi

Authors: Rita Talango; Aminuddin Aminuddin; Abdul Qadar Punagi; Nani Iriani Djufri;

Perbandingan efektivitas flutikason furoat intranasal dengan dan tanpa loratadin oral pada penderita rinitis alergi

Abstract

Background: Allergic rhinitis (RA) is a symptomatic disorder of the nose induced by IgE mediatedinflamation. Corticosteroid alone or in combination with antihistamine have been recommended bythe ARIA-WHO and is often used in the management of RA. Purpose: To compare the effectiveness ofa combination therapy of intranasal fluticasone furoate (IFF) and oral loratadine (LO) with a singletherapy of IFF, based on the levels of eosinophils and clinical symptoms patients with RA. Method: Openclinical trial with 40 of patients divided into two groups 20 patients was given a combination therapyand 20 patients was given only IFF. The level of eosinophils and clinical symptoms were examinedbefore and after therapy. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon, Friedman and Mann Whitney tests.Results: Showed decrease in eosinophils level and clinical symptoms were significant (p<0.05) in bothtreatment groups, but there was no significant difference (p>0.05) in the effectiveness between bothtreatments. Conclusion: Therapy with IFF, alone or combined with LO were effective to decrease thelevel of eosinophils and clinical symptoms and there was no difference in efficacy, but still combinationtherapy is better than single therapy. Keywords: allergic rhinitis, intranasal fluticasone furoate, oral loratadine Abstrak : Latar belakang: Rinitis alergi (RA) merupakan gangguan fungsi hidung, terjadi setelah pajananalergen melalui inflamasi mukosa hidung yang diperantarai IgE0. Penggunaan kortikosteroid baik tunggalmaupun kombinasi dengan antihistamin telah direkomendasikan oleh ARIA-WHO dan sering digunakandalam penatalaksanaan RA. Tujuan: Untuk membandingkan efektivitas terapi kombinasi flutikason furoatintranasal (FFI) dan loratadin oral (LO) dengan terapi tunggal FFI berdasarkan kadar eosinofil dan gejalaklinis penderita RA. Metode: Uji klinik terbuka pada 40 penderita RA, dibagi menjadi 20 penderita padakelompok pertama diberikan terapi kombinasi FFI dengan LO dan 20 penderita kelompok kedua diberikanterapi tunggal FFI. Pemeriksaan eosinofil dan gejala klinis dilakukan sebelum dan sesudah terapi. Datadianalisis menggunakan uji Wilcoxon, Friedman dan Mann Whitney. Hasil: Terjadi penurunan kadareosinofil dan gejala klinis secara signifikan (p<0,05) pada kedua kelompok terapi, namun tidak adaperbedaan efektivitas secara signifikan (p>0,05) antara kedua kelompok terapi. Kesimpulan: Terapi FFItunggal maupun dikombinasikan dengan LO efektif menurunkan kadar eosinofil dan gejala klinis sertatidak ada perbedaan efektivitas, namun terapi kombinasi masih lebih baik dibanding terapi tunggal. Kata kunci: rinitis alergi, flutikason furoat intranasal, loratadin oral

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
bronze