Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Bioabsorbable laminated membranes for guided bone regeneration

Authors: M, Kellomäki; K, Puumanen; N, Ashammakhi; T, Waris; S, Paasimaa; P, Törmälä;

Bioabsorbable laminated membranes for guided bone regeneration

Abstract

Guided tissue regeneration (GTR), or guided bone regeneration (GBR), can be considered as sub-areas of tissue engineering because the characteristics of newly forming tissue are commonly influenced as usual by the surgical intervention and more importantly by the morphology or topography of a biomaterial surface. Thus, in guided tissue regeneration no cell seeding and culturing is used, but the effect is reached via an implanted device, normally a membrane. The terms were first introduced in periodontal and oral applications, and in GTR the membrane is placed between the periodontal defect and the gingival tissue and in GBR the membrane is placed between the bone defect and the gingival tissues [1]. Later, the terms have been expanded to use in other fields, including repairing craniofacial bone defects [2–4]. Materials commonly used in GBR and GTR are membranes of GoreTex©R (non-resorbable PTFE membrane, needs to be removed in the long term), collagen and aliphatic polyesters (PLA, PGA, copolymers) [2,5–9]. Other materials, including polymer and hydroxyapatite membranes have also been studied for GBR [10]. Two different types of GBR-membranes having occlusive layer on one side and a layer with controlled porosity on the other side of the membrane were developed and studied here in vitro and in vivo.

Keywords

Bone Regeneration, Guided Tissue Regeneration, Polymers, Polyesters, Membranes, Artificial, Surgical Mesh, Tensile Strength, Absorbable Implants, Animals, Rabbits, Polyglycolic Acid

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!