
doi: 10.3233/ida-230897
With the rapid development and popularization of smart mobile devices, users tend to share their visited points-of-interest (POIs) on the network with attached location information, which forms a location-based social network (LBSN). LBSNs contain a wealth of valuable information, including the geographical coordinates of POIs and the social connections among users. Nowadays, lots of trust-enhanced approaches have fused the trust relationships of users together with other auxiliary information to provide more accurate recommendations. However, in the traditional trust-aware approaches, the embedding processes of the information on different graphs with different properties (e.g., user-user graph is an isomorphic graph, user-POI graph is a heterogeneous graph) are independent of each other and different embedding information is directly fused together without guidance, which limits their performance. More effective information fusion strategies are needed to improve the performance of trust-enhanced recommendation. To this end, we propose a T rust E nhanced POI recommendation approach with C ollaborative L earning (TECL) to merge geographic information and social influence. Our proposed model integrates two modules, a GAT-based graph autoencoder as trust relationships embedding module and a multi-layer deep neural network as a user-POI graph learning module. By applying collaborative learning strategy, these two modules can interact with each other. The trust embedding module can guide the selection of user’s potential features, and in turn the user-POI graph learning module enhances the embedding process of trust relationships. Different information is fused through the two-way interaction of information, instead of travelling in one direction. Extensive experiments are conducted using real-world datasets, and results illustrate that our suggested approach outperforms state-of-the-art methods.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
