
doi: 10.3233/fi-2012-767
In this paper we discuss the misunderstanding that have arisen over the years around the broadly defined term of the object-relational impedance mismatch. It occurs in various aspects of database application programming. There are three concerns judged the most important: mismatching data models, mismatching binding times and mismatching object lifecycle. This paper focuses on the data model mismatch. We introduce the common state theory, i.e. a unified model of objects in popular programming languages and databases. The proposed model exploits and emphasizes common properties of all these objects. Using our model we demonstrate that there are notably more similarities than differences. We conclude that the impact of the mismatch of data models can be significantly reduced.
data models, Data structures, object state, Database theory, object-relational mapping, impedance mismatch
data models, Data structures, object state, Database theory, object-relational mapping, impedance mismatch
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
