
doi: 10.3233/faia241433
handle: 11386/4892164
This paper explores the challenges of processing the increasing volume of natural language text, which often surpasses traditional methods’ real-time processing abilities. These texts are typically authored by individuals from diverse educational, cultural, and experiential backgrounds. The paper highlights the main linguistic and semantic issues that arise in the analysis of natural language text. Linguistic Text Mining is a computational approach that combines linguistic principles with computational techniques to extract high-quality information from natural language texts. Despite the frequent mentions of “Linguistic” and “Text-Mining” in scientific literature, no formal definition exists; this paper proposes one. It further explores LTMs potential in enhancing knowledge extraction by emphasizing linguistic features, such as multi-word units (MWUs). Traditional text analysis relies heavily on statistical methods, focusing on simple words, which are often polysemous, or on aggregating words without semantic context and this limits systems’ ability to interpret domain-specific semantics. By contrast, MWUs, like “credit card”, convey specific, unambiguous meanings, critical for identifying specialized domains. MWUs are typically organized within ontologies that represent distinct knowledge domains. Building on previous work, the study compares AUTOMETA, an ontology-based approach using finite automata for MWU identification, with large language model (LLM)-based and other ontology-driven Linguistic Text Mining methods. Findings suggest that integrating linguistic frameworks significantly improves information extraction, offering a deeper understanding of complex language structures.
Linguistic; Text Mining; Linguistic Text Mining; Natural Language Processing; Multi-Word Unit; Finite Automata.
Linguistic; Text Mining; Linguistic Text Mining; Natural Language Processing; Multi-Word Unit; Finite Automata.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
