
doi: 10.3233/faia220640
As social robots increase in capabilities and become ubiquitous parts of the environment, there will be more conflicts between humans and technological agents. Conflict is not necessarily bad: it can provide opportunities for sharing information, calibrating trust, and establishing common situation awareness—provided the conflict plays out in a reasonable manner. Social robots should be designed to act in conflict with humans gracefully and artfully, in order to use conflict as a mode of communication, limiting the adverse effects of confusion, frustration, and deadlock.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
