
doi: 10.3233/faia200613
The paper presents the investigation of The Dictionary of Modern Lithuanian (6th edition) from the point of view of its coverage in comparison with a Joint Corpus of Lithuanian. Resources, methods and procedures are described together with the results revealing that only 81 % of the dictionary lemmas have their counterparts in the corpus.
updates of traditional dictionaries, corpus-based lexicography, Hunspell platform, comparison of dictionaries and corpora
updates of traditional dictionaries, corpus-based lexicography, Hunspell platform, comparison of dictionaries and corpora
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
