
The FAIR Guiding Principles, published in 2016, aim to improve the findability, accessibility, interoperability and reusability of digital research objects for both humans and machines. Until now the FAIR principles have been mostly applied to research data. The ideas behind these principles are, however, also directly relevant to research software. Hence there is a distinct need to explore how the FAIR principles can be applied to software. In this work, we aim to summarize the current status of the debate around FAIR and software, as basis for the development of community-agreed principles for FAIR research software in the future. We discuss what makes software different from data with regard to the application of the FAIR principles, and which desired characteristics of research software go beyond FAIR. Then we present an analysis of where the existing principles can directly be applied to software, where they need to be adapted or reinterpreted, and where the definition of additional principles is required. Here interoperability has proven to be the most challenging principle, calling for particular attention in future discussions. Finally, we outline next steps on the way towards definite FAIR principles for research software.
[SDV.BIBS] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Quantitative Methods [q-bio.QM], software sustainability, researchsoftware, research software, 1702 Artificial Intelligence, 1710 Information Systems, 2611 Modelling and Simulation, reproducible research, 1701 Computer Science (miscellaneous), 2613 Statistics and Probability, reproducibleresearch, 2605 Computational Mathematics, FAIR, softwaresustainability
[SDV.BIBS] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Quantitative Methods [q-bio.QM], software sustainability, researchsoftware, research software, 1702 Artificial Intelligence, 1710 Information Systems, 2611 Modelling and Simulation, reproducible research, 1701 Computer Science (miscellaneous), 2613 Statistics and Probability, reproducibleresearch, 2605 Computational Mathematics, FAIR, softwaresustainability
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 161 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
