Analytical solutions to the model problem of unsteady Newtonian fluid flow in straight, elastic-walled vessels can provide: theoretical insights into the flow of blood in arteries; a theoretical basis for clinical measurements in diagnoses of arterial flow rates; and guidance for boundary conditions in numerical simulations of flow in finite computational domains. However, while Womersley's analyses of blood flow assume solution forms that treat the flow as periodic and continuously unsteady, many flow variables in the smaller arteries are not continuously unsteady at all. They are characterized more accurately as rapid transient motions followed by a period of recovery to a stationary state, repeated in successive cycles. These flows are not continually unsteady ones described by Womersley's solutions but unsteady flows restarted from rest in each cycle, characterized as initial-boundary value problems. In this paper, we compare the Womersley and initial-boundary value solutions for model transients that stop then restart, explain these previously unreported limitations of Womersley's solutions, and demonstrate how the initial-boundary value solutions provide excellent agreement with measurements of blood flow in the anterior tibial and popliteal arteries of patients. Some consequences of these findings for understanding and interpreting measurements of blood flow, and for prescribing boundary conditions in computer simulations of arterial blood flow are discussed.