Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
https://doi.org/10.3...arrow_drop_down
https://doi.org/10.3233/bhr210...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
mEDRA
Part of book or chapter of book . 2021
Data sources: mEDRA
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Cells in Urothelium Tissue Engineering

Authors: Berte, N.; Mazeaud, C.; Eschwege, P.; Gillet, P.; Pinzano, A.; Lemelle, J.L.; Grossin, L.;

Cells in Urothelium Tissue Engineering

Abstract

Urothelium is a highly specialized epithelium covering the entire urinary excretory system. Tissue engineering of this urinary tract may allow to consider its reconstruction to perform in vitro studies or in vivo replacement. Therefore, the question of specific reconstruction of the urothelium arises in order to guarantee the neotissue’s ability to act as a barrier against highly cytotoxic urine. This literature review describes the different cell types and strategies available for this reconstruction. The non-reconstruction of urothelium relies on the colonization of a biomaterial by the adjacent healthy tissue but allows only incomplete reconstruction and fibrosis. The use of autologous urothelial cells requires preliminary surgery and has not been successful enough in humans. Research has therefore focused on the use of stem cells. Adipose Derived Stem Cells (ADSCs) and Bone Marrow Derived Stem Cells (BMSCs) allow the reconstruction of the smooth muscle layer, but have little effect on urothelium reconstruction. Urine Derived Stem Cells (UDSCs) and Bladder mesenchymal Stem Cells (BSCs) are very promising because they allow the achievement of a differentiated urothelium. Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (IPSCs) and Embryonic Stem Cells (ESCs) can be differentiated towards urothelial phenotype but their use is restricted by ethics.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!