Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Impaired expression of Drosha in breast cancer

Authors: Ali Akbar, Poursadegh Zonouzi; Mohammad, Shekari; Azim, Nejatizadeh; Samira, Shakerizadeh; Hedieh, Fardmanesh; Ahmad, Poursadegh Zonouzi; Mohammad, Rahmati-Yamchi; +1 Authors

Impaired expression of Drosha in breast cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Impaired miRNAs processing pathway is one interesting scenario for global downregulation of the miRNAome in various types of malignancy. We previously reported that DGCR8 and Dicer genes dysregulated in patients with breast cancer. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the expression pattern of Drosha in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: We evaluated the mRNA expression level of Drosha in 70 fresh breast carcinomas and adjacent non-neoplastic tissue using quantitative real-time PCR and assessed the possible correlation between its expression and clinicopathological parameters. RESULTS: Our results revealed that mRNA expression level of Drosha was decreased in tumors when compared to adjacent non-neoplastic tissue. However, this difference is not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Downregulation of Drosha is related to older age at diagnosis, higher histological grade, higher tumor size and metastasis. However, there was no significant correlation between Drosha expression level and clinicopathological parameters (P > 0.05). We found that Drosha expression negatively correlated with DGCR8 (P = 0.043), whereas dysregulated expression levels of Drosha and Dicer are positively correlated with to each other (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that the expression of Drosha is impaired in breast cancer. However, the molecular basis of observed expression pattern have remained inexplicable and should be further investigated.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Ribonuclease III, Humans, RNA-Binding Proteins, Breast Neoplasms, Female, RNA, Messenger, Middle Aged, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Top 10%
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!