
doi: 10.3233/atde190124
We have to make a decision even if utility functions and measurement procedures of alternatives are not given clearly. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a multi-criteria decision-making process in transdisciplinary areas. The process does not assume linear order of utility and priorities of alternatives; they are given as ratios from pairwise comparisons with regards on each criterion. This study is on the pairwise comparisons. First, I introduce a criterion, called naturality in this article. It is a generalized concept of Condorcet’s principle. And I provide a link diagram to confirm naturality. Finally, I describe a rating procedure to aggregate weights which satisfy naturality.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
