Argumentation schemes in AI and Law

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 24 Mar 2021 English Publisher:SAGE PublicationsJournal:Argument & Computation, volume 12, pages 417-434 (issn: 1946-2166, eissn: 1946-2174,

Copyright policy )

Authors: Katie Atkinson; Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon;

doi: 10.3233/aac-200543

Argumentation schemes in AI and Law

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

In this paper we describe the impact that Walton’s conception of argumentation schemes had on AI and Law research. We will discuss developments in argumentation in AI and Law before Walton’s schemes became known in that community, and the issues that were current in that work. We will then show how Walton’s schemes provided a means of addressing all of those issues, and so supplied a unifying perspective from which to view argumentation in AI and Law.

Related Organizations

University of Liverpool
United Kingdom

Keywords

Electronic computers. Computer science, Computational linguistics. Natural language processing, QA75.5-76.95, P98-98.5

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	16
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%