Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
https://doi.org/10.3...arrow_drop_down
https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-...
Part of book or chapter of book . 1997 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

ON THE PROBLEM OF VALIDATING COMPUTER ASSISTED MEDICAL IMAGE INTERPRETATION

Authors: null Van Cleynenbreugel Johan; null Nuyts Johan; null Verbeeck Rudi; null Smet Maria-Helena; null Marchal Guy; null Suetens Paul;

ON THE PROBLEM OF VALIDATING COMPUTER ASSISTED MEDICAL IMAGE INTERPRETATION

Abstract

Hinging on approaches from the fields of clinical imaging and information technology assessment in medicine, a validation scheme is presented for 3-D biomedical image interpretation. This scheme considers measurement of algorithmic accuracy and evaluation of clinical functionality and usefulness. The former component is meant to characterize the intrinsic quality of a method, the latter to assess how well a method serves its clininal goals. Four examples from our own research are used to illustrate this scheme. We report on the validation of (1) a semi-automatic method to quantify myocardial perfusion on SPECT images, (2) bone segmentation accuracy on spiral CT images, (3) a workstation for stereotactic neurosurgery, and, (4) stereolithographic models.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!