
Hinging on approaches from the fields of clinical imaging and information technology assessment in medicine, a validation scheme is presented for 3-D biomedical image interpretation. This scheme considers measurement of algorithmic accuracy and evaluation of clinical functionality and usefulness. The former component is meant to characterize the intrinsic quality of a method, the latter to assess how well a method serves its clininal goals. Four examples from our own research are used to illustrate this scheme. We report on the validation of (1) a semi-automatic method to quantify myocardial perfusion on SPECT images, (2) bone segmentation accuracy on spiral CT images, (3) a workstation for stereotactic neurosurgery, and, (4) stereolithographic models.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
