
doi: 10.32084/tkp.9020
This article discusses the principles of and premises for liability for damage caused by AI systems. It applies to liability models based on the principles of risk and guilt. It indicates that different groups of entities, e.g. programmers, may be responsible for the creation of AI under the principle of guilt, while producers and merchants may put it into circulation under the principle of risk. The liability of AI system users should be tempered and based on the principle of guilt. This article includes a critical view of the AI Act and the relevant directives. It points out that effective liability for damage should be related to the level of harm caused (harm to a person, human death) and not dependent on whether it was inflicted by a high-risk system or any other AI system.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
