Bewertung der methodischen Qualität systematischer Übersichtsarbeiten mit AMSTAR 2

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Conference object 12 Feb 2020 German Publisher:German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; Düsseldorf

Authors: Pieper, D; Matthias, K; Jacobs, A; Wegewitz, U;

doi: 10.3205/20ebm140

Bewertung der methodischen Qualität systematischer Übersichtsarbeiten mit AMSTAR 2

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Beschreibung: Die Bewertung der methodischen Qualität systematischer Übersichtsarbeiten muss vielfach durchgeführt werden, wie z.B. in Leitlinien oder Overviews. AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) war bis vor einigen Jahren das am häufigsten verwendete Instrument[zum vollständigen Text gelangen Sie über die oben angegebene URL]

Nützliche patientenrelevante Forschung; 21. Jahrestagung des Deutschen Netzwerks Evidenzbasierte Medizin

Related Organizations

Witten/Herdecke University
Germany
Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Germany
Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss
Germany

Keywords

ddc: 610, 610 Medical sciences; Medicine

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average

Found an issue? Give us feedback

0

Average

Fields of Science

Fields of Science