Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
https://dx.doi.org/1...arrow_drop_down
https://dx.doi.org/10.3205/15g...
Conference object . 2015
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Datacite
German Medical Science
Conference object . 2015
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: German Medical Science
 View all 2 versions
Claim

Diskrepanzen zwischen den objektiven Kriterien der Prüfungsgüte und der subjektiv wahrgenommenen Prüfungsgüte durch Studierenden und Dozierende

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Conference object 31 Aug 2015 German Publisher:German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; Düsseldorf
Authors: Fischer, V; Müller, H; Just, I; Krohn, M;

doi: 10.3205/15gma019

Diskrepanzen zwischen den objektiven Kriterien der Prüfungsgüte und der subjektiv wahrgenommenen Prüfungsgüte durch Studierenden und Dozierende

Abstract

Fragestellung/Einleitung: Wenn es um „gute Prüfungen“ geht, bestimmt die Perspektive die Beurteilung: Politische Normen werden meist durch einfache Vorgabe wie die Notenverteilung ausgedrückt. Teststatistische Kennwerte sind die wissenschaftlich anerkannten objektiven Kriterien.[zum vollständigen Text gelangen Sie über die oben angegebene URL]

Gemeinsame Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Medizinische Ausbildung (GMA) und des Arbeitskreises zur Weiterentwicklung der Lehre in der Zahnmedizin (AKWLZ)

Related Organizations
Keywords

ddc: 610, 610 Medical sciences; Medicine

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!
uploadUpload now