Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ German Medical Scien...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
German Medical Science
Conference object . 2015
License: CC BY
Data sources: German Medical Science
https://dx.doi.org/10.3205/15d...
Conference object . 2015
Data sources: Datacite
 View all 2 versions
Claim

Vergleich zweier teilstreckenfähiger optischer Biometer (Zeiss IOLMaster 700 und Haag-streit Lenstar LS900) (K)

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Conference object 01 Jan 2015Embargo end date: 09 Jun 2015 German Publisher:German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
Authors: Hoffmann, P; Abraham, M;

doi: 10.3205/15doc080

Vergleich zweier teilstreckenfähiger optischer Biometer (Zeiss IOLMaster 700 und Haag-streit Lenstar LS900) (K)

Abstract

Zielsetzung: Überprüfung der Differenzen der mit beiden Geräten generierten Datensätze für die IOL-Berechnung. Der IOLMaster 700 misst die Teilstrecken des optischen Pfades per OCT, der Lenstar per OLCR. Methode: 222 konsekutive Katarakt-Augen wurden mit beiden Geräten[for full text, please go to the a.m. URL]

28. Internationaler Kongress der Deutschen Ophthalmochirurgen

Keywords

ddc: 610, 610 Medical sciences; Medicine

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green