Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
https://dx.doi.org/1...arrow_drop_down
https://dx.doi.org/10.3205/11g...
Conference object . 2011
Data sources: Datacite
German Medical Science
Conference object . 2011
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: German Medical Science
 View all 2 versions
Claim

Der Einsatz von Apple iPads zur Bewertung von OSCE-Kandidaten als gewinnbringender Ersatz für gängige Papierchecklisten? Eine systematische Vergleichsstudie zur Akzeptanz und den vorgenommenen Globalbewertungen von elektronischen Checklisten mit ihren Papierversionen

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Conference object 01 Jan 2011Embargo end date: 26 Sep 2011 German Publisher:German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; Düsseldorf
Authors: Schmitz, F; Zimmermann, P;

doi: 10.3205/11gma066

Der Einsatz von Apple iPads zur Bewertung von OSCE-Kandidaten als gewinnbringender Ersatz für gängige Papierchecklisten? Eine systematische Vergleichsstudie zur Akzeptanz und den vorgenommenen Globalbewertungen von elektronischen Checklisten mit ihren Papierversionen

Abstract

Fragestellung: Wir haben das mobile System e-OSCE entwickelt, das elektronische Bewertungen von OSCE-Kandidaten mittels iPads ermöglicht. 2 Hypothesen wurden geprüft: (H1) Verglichen mit den gängigen Papierchecklisten wird e-OSCE besser akzeptiert. (H2) Die Kandidatenbewertungen werde[for full text, please go to the a.m. URL]

Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Medizinische Ausbildung (GMA)

Keywords

ddc: 610, 610 Medical sciences; Medicine

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!
uploadUpload now