
doi: 10.32041/pwd.3902
This article presents the results of the examination of practice in the field of interviews with minor victims of offences, conducted in the legal reality after legislative amendments, that is, after the entry into force of amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure of 13 June 2013 (Dz.U. 2013, item 849). The analysis covered 151 criminal cases. During the performed case file studies it has been determined e.g. that the possibility to conduct a friendly hearing of minors which are over 15 years old in accordance with article 185a § 4 of Code of Criminal Procedure is, as a rule, not used in practice by authorities which are conducting criminal proceedings. It has also been observed that minors participating in hearings in Friendly Hearing Room are not testifying in presentence of judge and expert psychologist only, but that such activity is sometimes undertaken with parallel dictation of minutes by the judge. Many concerns were also made in reference to the manner in which friendly places of hearings were arranged and due to failure to ensure that the child is properly represented during hearing.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
