
pmid: 15496236
pmc: PMC3320391
(Uploaded by Plazi for the IPBES Invasive Alien Species Assessment) The spread of WNV in California is tracked., West Nile virus (WNV) was first isolated in California during July 2003 from a pool of Culex tarsalis collected near El Centro, Imperial County. WNV transmission then increased and spread in Imperial and Coachella Valleys, where it was tracked by isolation from pools of Cx. tarsalis, seroconversions in sentinel chickens, and seroprevalence in free-ranging birds. WNV then dispersed to the city of Riverside, Riverside County, and to the Whittier Dam area of Los Angeles County, where it was detected in dead birds and pools of Cx. pipiens quinquefasciatus. By October, WNV was detected in dead birds collected from riparian corridors in Los Angeles, west to Long Beach, and through inland valleys south from Riverside to San Diego County. WNV was reported concurrently from Arizona in mid-August and from Baja, Mexico, in mid-November. Possible mechanisms for virus introduction, amplification, and dispersal are discussed.
St. Louis encephalitis virus, environment assessment, Climate, Culex tarsalis, Infectious and parasitic diseases, RC109-216, California, invasive species, Birds, Animals, IPBES, Alien Invasive Species Assessment AIS, Chapter 5, biodiversity, Bird Diseases, Research, R, invasion, Culex, surveillance, Medicine, Chickens, Sentinel Surveillance, West Nile virus, West Nile Fever
St. Louis encephalitis virus, environment assessment, Climate, Culex tarsalis, Infectious and parasitic diseases, RC109-216, California, invasive species, Birds, Animals, IPBES, Alien Invasive Species Assessment AIS, Chapter 5, biodiversity, Bird Diseases, Research, R, invasion, Culex, surveillance, Medicine, Chickens, Sentinel Surveillance, West Nile virus, West Nile Fever
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 217 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
