Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The Academy and the Kunstkamera: The first experiences in self-knowledge of the Empire

Authors: A. V. Golovnev;

The Academy and the Kunstkamera: The first experiences in self-knowledge of the Empire

Abstract

The experience of creating and exploring the Russian Empire belongs to Peter I, who had the qualities of a researcher and experimenter, and all institutions involved in the study of Russia, including the Kunstkamera and the Academy of Sciences, were his projects (the word “project” entered the Russian lexicon under Peter). At the end of the Northern War, Russia, in the person of its emperor, became interested in itself at a new geopolitical level, sending expeditions to explore and cartograph the southern, northern and eastern borders of the country. The continuation of the self-knowledge of the empire was the unprecedented Second Kamchatka, or Great Northern Expedition (1733–1743). Among its results was not only the compilation of maps (more than 60) of the empire and a description of its remote regions (Siberia, Kamchatka), but also the birth of a secular “fashion for peoples”, expressed in the “procession of peoples” during the amusing “Ice Wedding” (1740), in the preparation of which the Academy and the Kunstkamera took an active part. A breakthrough in self-research of Russia during the Enlightenment era was the Physical (Academic) expeditions of 1768–1774, which brought the birth of the science of ethnography (narodovedenie, Völkerkunde) and the formation of the national (imperial) idea of Russia as a country abundant and rich in peoples.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?